Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 4682

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : December | Volume : 17 | Issue : 12 | Page : OC10 - OC13 Full Version

Clinical Profile and Outcome of Acute Myocardial Infarction among Young Adults at a Tertiary Care Centre in Manipur, India: A Cohort Study


Published: December 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/67262.18800
KR Sarath Chandran, Salam Kenny Singh, Sunil Kumar Singh Leishangthem

1. Senior Resident, Department of Medicine, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Medicine, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Salam Kenny Singh,
Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal-795004, Manipur, India.
E-mail: salamkenny958@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) is rising in young adults. Timely control of cardiovascular risk factors is important to prevent the increasing incidence of AMI in young adults.

Aim: To analyse the clinical profile, risk factors, and outcomes of AMI among the young adult population in Manipur, India.

Materials and Methods: A hospital-based cohort study was conducted in a tertiary care centre at Department of Medicine, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal, Manipur, India from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022, among patients aged 45 years or younger attending the medicine Outpatient Department (OPD), admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and Intensive Coronary Care Unit (ICCU) with the first attack of AMI. Cases involving pregnancy, known cases of pericarditis, and Congenital Heart Disease (CHD) were excluded. Data were collected using a performa regarding demographic profile, clinical presentation, risk factors, and treatment outcomes. The data were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 21.0 and expressed as descriptive statistics.

Results: A total of 39 cases were reported with a mean age of 40.2±4.6 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 9:1. The majority of cases presented with chest pain (74.3%), followed by shortness of breath (40%), nausea (13%), and collapse (10%). 75% of cases presented with multiple clinical features. The most common risk factors in young adults were smoking (84.6%), alcohol consumption (56.4%), family history of heart disease (25.6%), hypertension (20.5%), substance abuse (20.5%), diabetes (17.9%), and dyslipidemia (25.6%). Cases showed elevated cardiac enzymes - Creatine Kinase-Myocardial Band (CK-MB) (92.3%) and Troponin I (94.9%). Electrocardiogram (ECG) changes revealed ST segment elevation MI (89.7%). Only one case resulted in death during the hospital stay.

Conclusion: The incidence of AMI among young adult populations is increasing, emphasising the need to raise awareness regarding cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle modifications. However, the cases have shown good clinical outcomes among young adults with the disease.

Keywords

Electrocardiogram, Presentation, Risk-factors, Substance abuse

The burden of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) is among the highest in India worldwide. The annual number of deaths from CVD in India is projected to rise from 2.26 million (1990) to 4.77 million (2020) (1). The prevalence rates of coronary heart disease in India have been estimated over the past several decades and have ranged from 1.6% to 7.4% in rural populations and from 1% to 13.2% in urban populations (2). The INTERHEART study revealed that, even at younger ages, Indians have higher rates of CVD risk factors compared to other ethnic groups, including diabetes, hypertension, and abdominal obesity (3). Over the past 25 years, India has witnessed a sharp increase in the prevalence rates of CVD risk factors, particularly in metropolitan areas. The reasons behind this high burden of risk factors are not well understood. Cohort studies, in this regard, provide objective estimations of the relationship between exposure and outcomes, which can improve understanding of the factors contributing to CVD (4).

Overall, the prevalence estimates vary due to the poorly-defined clinical profiles of atherosclerotic and non atherosclerotic phenotypes. This lack of definition is especially true for patients presenting with Myocardial Infarction with Non Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) because differentiation based on angiography alone, without routine intracoronary imaging and non uniform work-up, has led to poor identification of non plaque mechanisms (5). The incidence of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) in the young has been reported to be 12%-16% among Indians. Approximately 25% of AMI cases and half of all deaths in India from CVDs (i.e., 52% of CVDs) occur in individuals under the age of forty. Heart diseases are occurring in Indians 5 to 10 years earlier than in other populations around the world (6).

In South Asia (Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka), the median age for the first presentation of AMI is 53 years, whereas in Western Europe, China, and Hong Kong, it is 63 years, with a higher incidence rate among males than females, according to the INTERHEART study. Men were four times more likely than women to experience AMI incidents between the ages of 20 and 64, based on data from the Singapore Myocardial Infarction (MI) Registry collected between 1988 and 1997 [3,7]. Asian women presented with their first MI at a higher median age (58 years) compared to Asian males (54 years), which aligns with the findings of the INTERHEART study. The age-standardised incidence rate for both sexes in Indians is higher than for any other Asian community, including Chinese, Malay, and Indians. Around 4.4% of Asian women and 9.7% of males under 40 experience their first MI attack, which is two to 3.5 times higher than the population in Western Europe and the third-highest among all the regions studied globally (3),(8). Myocardial Infarction with Non Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) is more common in women than in males and is estimated to affect 6% to 8% of patients diagnosed with MI (9). Cigarette smoking has been strongly associated with CAD in young adults, while other traditional risk factors have shown a weaker association. Hypertension and lack of exercise are well-established risk factors for CAD in general, but they appear to contribute only marginally in this population. Literature has demonstrated surprisingly good prognosis up to three years after the diagnosis of CAD in young adults (10). Among young individuals with MI, plaque rupture accounts for approximately 60% to 65% of cases, which is similar to older individuals. Studies have shown that the use of cocaine, amphetamines, oral contraceptives (especially in combination with smoking), and marijuana can be associated with the cause of MI (11),(12).

To the best of authors’ knowledge, there is a scarcity of data in Manipur compared to data accumulated elsewhere in other parts of India to evaluate the clinical profile and risk factors of young patients presenting with AMI. The increasing trend of MI and associated mortality in Manipur is a concern, and the need of the hour is a better understanding of the disease and its associated risk factors in order to prevent the rising trend of AMI. Hence, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical profile, risk factors, and treatment outcomes of young patients presenting with AMI at Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS) Hospital, Imphal, Manipur.

Material and Methods

A hospital-based cohort study was conducted among young adults aged 45 years or less, diagnosed with the first attack of AMI, attending the Department of Medicine and admitted to the ICU and ICCU at Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Imphal, Manipur, from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022.

The sample size was not calculated as the study aimed to include all eligible cases during the study period. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Research Ethics Board (Ref. No. A/206/REB-Comm(SP)/RIMS/2015/698/40/2020), RIMS, Imphal. Informed consent was obtained from the study participants before data collection, and confidentiality was maintained by limiting the identifying variables to a minimum.

Inclusion criteria: The study included thirty-nine (39) patients of both sexes aged forty-five years or less, diagnosed with the first attack of AMI, attending the Department of Medicine and admitted to the ICU and ICCU, who provided consent.

Exclusion criteria:

i) Patients under 18 years of age
ii) Known cases of pericarditis
iii) Congenital Heart Diseases (CHD)
iv) Pregnancy

A predefined performa was used to collect socio-demographic profiles, risk factors, clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes (death or recovery), ECG findings, cardiac enzymes such as CK-MB and Troponin I, serum lipid profile, glycated haemoglobin, chest X-ray (PA view), 2D echocardiography, coronary angiogram, and other biochemical investigation details. MI and Body Mass Index (BMI) were defined according to the Fourth Universal definition of MI (2018) and the WHO (Asia Pacific classification) as per Thygesen K et al., (9) and WHO guidelines (10).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analysed using IBM SPSS 21.0 for Windows. Continuous variables were expressed as mean±Standard Deviation (SD), while categorical variables were presented as frequency (percentages). Only descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data.

Results

The demographic profile, such as the age and BMI of the participants, is shown in (Table/Fig 1). The cases of AMI among young adults were predominantly seen in males (89.7%) and overweight individuals (59%). Different symptoms were observed in young adult AMI cases upon presentation at the hospital, as shown in (Table/Fig 2), with chest pain being the most common presenting symptom (74.3%). The most common risk factor observed in young adults with AMI was smoking (84.6%), as shown in (Table/Fig 3). Among smoking habits, the most common pack years of smoking reported in the present study were 5-10 pack years (69.6%). Elevated levels of CK-MB were found in 92.3% of the young adult AMI patients, while elevated levels of Troponin I were observed in 94.9% of the patients, as shown in (Table/Fig 4). The most common ECG finding related to the site of MI in young adults was the anterior wall (43.6%), followed by the anteroseptal wall (25.6%), as shown in (Table/Fig 5). The ECG findings of the study population upon presentation at the hospital showed that 89.7% of patients had ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), while 10.3% had non ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI), as shown in (Table/Fig 6). Echocardiography studies conducted on the population revealed Regional Wall Motion Abnormality (RWMA) in 34 patients (87.2%), Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) ≥50% in 20 patients (51.4%), LVEF 40-49% in 14 patients (35.8%), and LVEF <40% in 5 patients (12.8%), as shown in (Table/Fig 7). The most common blood vessel involved in young adult AMI patients was the Proximal Left Anterior Descending Artery (PLAD) (69.2%). The overall in-hospital mortality in the study population due to MI in young patients was 3.0%, while the remaining 97% of patients recovered from AMI, as shown in (Table/Fig 8).

Discussion

The present study provides insight into the clinical profile, risk factors, and treatment outcomes of young adults with MI. The study included 39 young patients (45 years or less) presenting to RIMS hospital with their first attack of AMI. The mean (SD) age of the young patients with MI in this study was 40.2 (±4.6) years. Similar findings were reported in studies conducted by Bhardwaj R et al., (mean age 35.4 years), Neki NS et al., (mean age 38.7 years), whereas Sricharan KN et al., demonstrated different results with a mean age of 26 years (11),(12),(13). The majority of the young patients with AMI in the present study were males (89.7%), with only four female patients. Comparable findings were seen in studies conducted by Bhardwaj R et al., and Neki NS et al., (11),(12). This may be due to a higher prevalence of risk factors in males compared to females, as supported by the comparison of risk factor prevalence between males and females. Although current smoking posed a similar risk in men and women, former smoking carried a higher risk in men (3).

The present study revealed that the majority of the cases were overweight individuals. This finding is similar to the study conducted by Gupta R et al., where overweight and abdominal obesity were identified as important risk factors associated with MI in young patients (4). An alarming rate of 35% and 58% of patients under the age of 45 years after MI were found to be obese (14),(15),(16),(17). The presenting complaint of AMI in young adults in this study was similar to the classical presentation of worsening angina that culminates in MI. Similar presentations have been observed in previous literature (11),(14),(15).

The most common ECG finding regarding the site of MI in young adults was the anterior wall (43.6%), followed by the anteroseptal wall (25.6%), inferior wall (25.6%), and antero-lateral wall (5.1%). Of the 39 patients, 35 had STEMI and only four had NSTEMI in the present study. Similar findings were reported in studies conducted by Sricharan KN et al., Deshmukh PP et al., and Rathod KS et al., where the majority of the AMI cases were ST segment elevation MI (13),(15),(16). ST segment elevation in the ECG is often observed if the patient presents to the emergency department soon after the onset of chest pain. Serial ECGs are of utmost importance as dynamic changes can be observed, which might be associated with substance abuse or treatment effects after the administration of vasodilators (17).

The study showed that on clinical examination, two patients had raised JVP and five patients had basilar rales on auscultation. In a similar study conducted by Deshmukh PP et al., the number of patients presenting with raised JVP and basilar rales was higher. These differences may be attributed to the smaller sample size in our study population, but the clinical significance should also be considered (15).

On echocardiography, RWMA was observed in 87.2% of the patients, and half of the patients (51.4%) had an LVEF of ≥50% in the present study. Similar findings have been reported by many previous authors in their literature (17),(18),(19). Cardiac enzymes are consistently elevated in all individuals with MI. Cardiac-specific Troponin-T elevation is considered the most sensitive marker of myocardial damage. False-positive increases in creatinine kinase levels are seen in patients who misuse cocaine (20),(21).

The most common blood vessel involved in young adults with AMI in the present study was the PLAD (69.2%). Similar findings were reported in studies conducted by Sinha SK et al., and Singh A et al., (2),(22).

The most common risk factors observed in young adults with AMI in the present study were smoking (84.6%), alcohol consumption (56.4%), family history of heart disease (25.6%), hypertension (20.5%), and diabetes (17.9%). Among the patients who were smokers, the most common pack years of smoking were five to ten pack years (69.6%) in the present study. These findings are consistent with the results of studies conducted by Sood N et al., and Pandya T et al., (23),(24). Gulati R et al., showed that smoking was the most common risk factor in young Indian males (25). Additionally, there were one or more risk factors present in young adults as the cause of MI. Studies conducted by Sinha SK et al., Gupta R et al., Neki NS, Deshmukh PP et al., and Chandregowda et al., showed a higher percentage of mortality, at 10% and 6%, respectively (2),(4),(12),(15),(26). This difference in mortality rates may be attributed to the smaller sample size in the present study.

Limitation(s)

One limitation of the study is the relatively small sample size, which may limit the generalisability of the findings. Conducting a multicentric longitudinal study with a larger sample size would help increase the robustness of the study. Additionally, due to logistic constraints, certain risk factors such as testing of apolipoprotein could not be included in the study. Including these factors could have added more power to the study.

Conclusion

The study concluded that young adult males, around 40 years of age, with co-morbidities, are commonly presented with AMI, with chest pain being the most common symptom. Sedentary lifestyles and multiple risk factors may contribute to the development of the disease. AMI in young patients typically showed ST segment elevation on ECG, elevated cardiac enzymes such as CK-MB and Troponin I, and regional wall motion abnormality on echocardiography. The most commonly involved blood vessel on coronary angiogram was the LAD. Treatment outcomes were favourable in this young population if timely intervention was provided. The study recommends timely identification and control of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors at an early age to help prevent the rise of the disease in the young adult population.

References

1.
Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global burden of disease study. Lancet. 1997;349(9064):1498-504. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Sinha SK, Krishna V, Thakur R, Kumar A, Mishra V, Jha MJ, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in very young adults: A clinical presentation, risk factors, hospital outcome index and their angiographic characteristics in North India- AMIYA Study. Atheroscler. 2017;13(2):79-87.
3.
Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Case-control study. Lancet. 2004;364(9438):937-52. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Gupta R, Joshi P, Mohan V, Reddy KS, Yusuf S. Epidemiology and causation of coronary heart disease and stroke in India. Heart. 2008;94(1):16-26. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Safdar BS, Dreyer RP. Presentation, clinical profile and prognosis of young patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): Results from the VIRGO Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(13):174-80. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
World Health Organization (WHO) India. National cardiovascular disease. Database. Available at: http://www.whoindia.org/LinkFiles/NMH Resources_National_CVD_ database-Final_Report.pdf. Accessed on:4th January 2021.
7.
Lavie CJ, Menezes AR, De Schutter A, Milani RV, Blumenthal JA. Impact of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training on psychological risk factors and subsequent prognosis in patients with cardiovascular disease. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(10 suppl2):365-73. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Hayes SN, Kim ESH, Saw J. American Heart Association Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Genomic and Precision Medicine; and Stroke Council. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: Current state of the science: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(19):523-57.
9.
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, et al; Executive Group on behalf of the Joint European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/ American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/World Heart Federation (WHF) Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(18):2231-64. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Obesity and overweight. World Health Organization. Available from: http://www. who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/. Accessed on: 21st April 2021.
11.
Bhardwaj R, Kandoria A, Sharma R. Myocardial infarction in young adults-risk factors and pattern of coronary artery involvement. Niger Med J. 2014;55(1):44-47. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Neki NS, Singh J, Bhoj JG, Sharma R. Clinical profile of acute myocardial infarction in young patients. Int J Curr Res Med Sci. 2017;3(7):01-07. [crossref]
13.
Sricharan KN, Rajesh S, Rashmi, Badiger M, Sanjeev M. Study of acute myocardial infarction in young adults: Risk factors, presentation and angiographic findings. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2012;6:257-60.
14.
Pillay AK, Naidoo DP. Atherosclerotic disease is the predominant aetiology of acute coronary syndrome in young adults. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2018;29(1):36-42. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Deshmukh PP, Singh MM, Deshpande MA, Rajput AS. Clinical and angiographic profile of very young adults presenting with first acute myocardial infarction: Data from a tertiary care center in Central India. Indian Heart J. 2019;71(5):418-21. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Rathod KS, Jones DA, Gallagher S. Atypical risk factor profile and excellent long-term outcomes of young patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2016;5(1):23-32. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Shah V, Jain U. Clinical profile of acute myocardial infarction in young adults. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2016;5:1709-13. [crossref]
18.
Desai R, Patel U, Parekh T, Hanna B, Sitammagari K, Fong HK, et al. Nation-wide trends in prevalent cardiovascular risk factors and diseases in young adults: Differences by sex and race and in-hospital outcomes. South Med J. 2020;113(6):311-19. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Alappatt NJ, Sailesh KS, Mukkadan J. Clinical profile of acute coronary syndrome in young adults. J Med Sci. 2016;2(6):01-06. [crossref]
20.
Yandrapalli S, Nabors C, Goyal A, Aronow WS, Frishman WH. Modifiable risk factors in young adults with first myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73(5):573-84. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Sapkal HB, Chandrakant R, Deshpande NS. Clinical profile of acute myocardial infarction in the young. Med Pulse Int J Medicine. 2019;11(2):148-50. [crossref]
22.
Singh A, Collins B, Qamar A, Gupta A, Fatima A, Divakaran S, et al. Study of young patients with myocardial infarction: Design and rationale of the YOUNG-MI Registry. Clin Cardiol. 2017;40(11):955-61. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Sood N, Sharma KN, Himral P, Sharma T, Kapoor D. Clinical profile of patients with hyponatremia in a tertiary care hospital in the sub-Himalayan region. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(2):834-38. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Pandya T, Suranagi MJ, Subramanyam K, Srinivasa KH. Study of young Indians with ST elevation myocardial infarction: Risk factors, clinical presentation, angiographic profile and short-term prognosis. Int J Contemp Med Surg Radiol. 2020;5(4):D7-13.
25.
Gulati R, Behfar A, Narula J, Kanwar A, Lerman A, Cooper L, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in young individuals. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2020;95(1):136-56. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Chandregowda, Mahesh K, Unnikrishnan A. A cross sectional study of acute myocardial infarction in young individuals below 40 years and associated risk factors in Mandya institute of medical sciences, Mandya, Karnataka. Int J Adv Med. 2021;8(4):511-16.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/67262.18800

Date of Submission: Aug 28, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Sep 11, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Nov 06, 2023
Date of Publishing: Dec 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 30, 2023
• Manual Googling: Oct 27, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Nov 02, 2023 (6%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com